The Centre told a five-judge constitution bench, which is hearing the WhatsApp privacy policy matter, that it would either frame a statutory rule or issue executive guidelines, which would be binding in nature, on data protection.
"At the outset, the central government is committed to freedom of choice and right to privacy of citizens. This is non-negotiable and we are committed for this," Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta told a bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra.
"We are already in the process of doing it (regulatory regime)," he told the bench, also comprising Justices A K Sikri, Amitava Roy, A M Khanwilkar and M M Shantanagoudar.
However, the apex court asked Mehta that if the citizens felt their rights are affected due to the privacy policy, what would be the role of the court.
"The issue would be that the statute and the Act, which is in consonance with the Constitution, requires that you have a regulatory regime. You say you are in the process. Once you are in the process and the citizen feels my rights are affected, what is the role of the court," the bench asked.
"Can a private corporate say that even if I affect or dent the fundamental rights of the citizen in absence of a regulation, the court cannot do it by issuing a writ," the bench asked Mehta, adding that till the time the regulatory regime comes into force, what kind of protection the court can grant.
Responding to the query, Mehta said a private entity cannot say that a writ petition for appropriate direction would not lie. "If people at large are affected, they cannot say so," he said.
The bench, however, asked "they say they are doing a business. They say they are trading in right to information, right to choice and right to knowledge. What kind of right is this?"
The law officer, however, said these private entities have to adhere to the directions given by the court.
On the issue of maintainablity of the plea, the Centre said the government was committed to ensure freedom of choice of the subscribers.
"So far as maintainability qua Union of India is concerned, we are always amenable to the court order. Qua us, the petition is maintainable," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)