Cong says consensus-based solution will ensure lasting peace

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 21 2017 | 5:49 PM IST
The Congress today came out with a guarded response on Ayodhya issue, saying there should either be a "consensus-based" solution, which will go a long way in ensuring lasting peace and goodwill, or the apex court should adjudicate the case on merit.
It also took a swipe at BJP, saying for 25 years, the issue has been used "for creating social strife for attaining electoral victories".
"If all stakeholders on both sides can arrive at a mutually acceptable consensus based solution, it will go a long way in ensuring lasting peace, goodwill, mutual respect and brotherhood. Otherwise, Supreme Court should adjudicate the issue on merits," Congress' chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala said.
He said the Supreme Court today made oral observation to look for an out-of -ourt settlement by mutual deliberation and consent.
"For the last 25 years, this issue has been used for attaining political power and at times for creating social strife for attaining electoral victories.
"The truth, however, is that 'dialogue' and 'mutual trust' have always been the cornerstone of India's civilisational values and our 'Ganga-Jamuni' culture," the Congress leader also said.
The Supreme Court today said fresh attempts must be made by all parties concerned to find a solution to the Ayodhya temple dispute which is a "sensitive" and "sentimental matter".
A bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar said that such religious issues can be solved through negotiations and offered to mediate to arrive at an amicable settlement.
Meanwhile, Congress MP Rajiv Shukla said that all parties involved in the dispute will go by what the court has to say.
(REOPENS DEL36)
Asked about the Ayodhya issue at the AICC briefing, Congress spokesperson Deepender Singh Hooda said the party welcomes a settlement out of the court, but if it is not possible the court is competent to give a verdict.
He said if both the sides want to settle the issue mutually through dialogue then it is welcome, otherwise the court is competent to settle the issue and give a verdict after hearing both sides.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 21 2017 | 5:49 PM IST

Next Story