Congress steps up demand for ouster of 21 AAP MLAs

The party said not receiving salary alone did not shield the AAP MLAs against provisions of 'office of profit' law

Arvind Kejriwal
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 15 2016 | 3:17 PM IST
Stepping up its demand for disqualification of 21 AAP MLAs appointed as Parliamentary Secretaries, Congress today said not receiving salary alone did not shield them against provisions of 'office of profit' law.

"AAP has cried hoarse saying that these 21 MLAs/ Parliamentary secretaries received no salaries. As they clamber to save themselves, it appears AAP have not bothered to read Supreme Court's judgements which have clearly stated that 'office of profit' is not deemed by salary alone," the party said in a commentary.

In the commentary posted on its website, the AICC insisted that the office of profit is determined by perks too.

"It is determined by perks, which undoubtedly these 21 MLAs were enjoying under Kejriwal's Government and at the cost of the Delhi tax-payer," it said in the commentary titled "Kejriwal has the 'Office', AAP MLAs enjoy the 'Profits'"

The party said that after winning 67 seats in the Delhi Assembly, Kejriwal had to accommodate many party colleagues in "positions of power".

As there is a limit to the number of Ministers, Shri Kejriwal, in an attempt at ingenuity, gave 21 MLAs the position of 'Parliamentary Secretaries'. These positions are not in the statute books, so are not legal and have been deemed an 'Office of Profit', it said.

It said as per the law, MLAs are not allowed to hold any office of profit under the central or state government or Union Territory administration.

The AICC claimed that rejection of the concerned bill by the President has shown that the "facade of honesty and integrity which Kejirwal and AAP have built is crumbling in the face of scrutiny."

It alleged that this is the latest in a long line of corruption charges being levelled against AAP. Transport Minister Gopal Rai, who was facing allegations of corruption in the Premium Bus Service scheme, has now been "forced" to resign from his post, it said.

"Instead of providing an explanation or accepting the precedent set by the Supreme Court, AAP has decided to take a leaf out of the BJP and Shri Narendra Modi's book and brazen out this scam. Thus, proving once and for all that AAP and BJP are two sides of the same coin," it added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 15 2016 | 3:02 PM IST

Next Story