Court accepts CBI's closure report in graft case

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 29 2015 | 10:48 AM IST
A special court has accepted CBI's closure report filed in a case lodged last year against 10 advertising agencies and unknown officials of Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity (DAVP) for allegedly causing loss to the state exchequer.
CBI had registered the case on the allegations that during November 2011, the Ministry of Defence's (MoD) Integrated Headquarters (Navy) had placed an order with DAVP for outdoor publicity/Navy campaign within a budget of Rs one crore and later, it was enhanced to Rs two crore by the officials without any approval of the Navy and Director General of DAVP.
It had alleged that orders were issued in favour of 15 advertising agencies in which bulk orders were placed to M/s Graphis Ads Pvt Ltd and M/s Pioneers but during monitoring, largescale irregularities and deficiencies in the works on the part of 10 advertising agencies were pointed out.
It had also claimed that in spite of objection raised about deficiencies in works, 100 per cent payment was made to the 10 firms by the officials of DAVP, who had allegedly abused their official position in connivance with the proprietors of the advertising agencies, which resulted in loss to the exchequer.
The case was lodged for alleged offences punishable under sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy) read with 420 (cheating) of the IPC and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
However, after conducting probe into the matter, CBI filed a closure report in the court saying that advertising agencies had displayed the advertisements as per term and conditions of DAVP and no deficiency was found in it.
Regarding the alleged loss to the exchequer, the agency said although it was found during investigation that excess payment was made to seven advertising firms but the matter has been sent to the DAVP to recover the excess payments.
Special CBI judge Vinod Kumar agreed with CBI's conclusion that there was no evidence of any conspiracy between public servants and private parties.
"I have perused the final report and I agree with the investigation that there is no evidence of any conspiracy between public persons and private parties or any evidence of criminal misconduct by public servants within the scope of Section 13 of PC Act, 1988. Accordingly, I accept the closure report," the judge said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 29 2015 | 10:48 AM IST

Next Story