The Madras High Court today ordered a CBI probe into the multi-crore gutkha scam, allegedly involving a Tamil Nadu minister besides a former and a serving top police official.
The case was being investigated till now by the Tamil Nadu police.
The court, however, said this did not cast any aspersion on the probe by the state police or the state vigilance authorities.
"The clandestine gutkha business is a crime against society, which needed to be curbed," the bench, comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Abdul Quddhose said, while issuing its directions on a plea by DMK MLA J Anbazhagan.
"We, therefore, deem it appropriate to direct the CBI to investigate the illegal manufacture, import, supply, distribution and sale of gutkha and other forms of chewable tobacco... detect and take action against those involved in the offence... in connivance with public/government servants," the bench said.
The scam came to light on July 8, 2017, when Income-Tax sleuths raided the godown, offices and residences of a pan masala and gutka manufacturer in Tamil Nadu, who had been facing charges of tax evasion to the tune of Rs 250 crore.
The manufacture, storage and sale of the chewable forms of tobacco, including gutka and pan masala were banned by the Tamil Nadu government in 2013.
During the raids, the department had seized a diary containing names of those, who had been allegedly paid by the gutka manufacturers.
DMK had sought appointment of a special investigation team (SIT) headed by a retired judge of the high court and comprising CBI officials, to inquire into the matter.
The counter-affidavits of the chairman, Board of Central Excise and Customs and the director general of Vigilance, Customs and Central Excise Intelligence and the additional director general of Central Excise intelligence have also been sought in the matter.
This is to exercise the case of any complicity of Central Excise officers in the illegal manufacturing, distribution and sale of gutkha and other forms of chewable tobacco from the vigilance angle.
The bench further said, "In our considered view the handing over of investigation to CBI only ensures co-ordinating investigation publicly in specified categories of serious offences having ramification in more than one state."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
