Court frames charges against BJP leader for defaming Dikshit

The court directed Diskhit to appear before it on October 28 to record her evidence against Gupta

Sheila Dikshit
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 06 2013 | 4:22 PM IST
A Delhi court today framed criminal defamation charges against ex-Delhi BJP chief Vijender Gupta in a complaint filed by Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit.

"...Charge under section 500 IPC (defamation) is framed against the accused (Gupta) to which he pleads not guilty and claims trial," Metropolitan Magistrate Namrita Aggarwal said.

The court directed Diskhit to appear before it on October 28 to record her evidence against Gupta.

Also Read

The order of the court came on a complaint filed by Diskhit against Gupta alleging that the BJP leader had used "uncivilised" language against her in the run up to the MCD polls last year while accusing her of helping and conniving with power companies.

The court had on July 1 found that prima facie an offence of defamation is made out against Gupta.

In the court today, Gupta pleaded not guilty to the charge and said, "I am feeling humiliated. If you (court) go through the interview, nowhere have I used any defamatory word against the Chief Minister. If I am guilty, put me in jail right away."

Meanwhile, the counsel for Diskhit moved an exemption application which was opposed by Gupta's counsel Ajay Burman saying the date of hearing was already in her knowledge and, therefore, there was no ground for her to seek exemption.

"I am being harassed as the Chief Minister gets exemption whenever she wants without citing proper reasons while I have to give minor details for seeking an exemption," Gupta said.

The BJP leader said when he seeks exemption from appearance, he is acted against while the CM is allowed non-appearance. To this, the court assured him that coercive action would also be taken against Dikshit if she fails to appear on the next date of hearing.

"As on next date her evidence is to be recorded. Therefore, whenever the court requires attendance of either the accused or the complainant, they will have to come before it. That court does not favour anyone," the judge said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 06 2013 | 4:03 PM IST

Next Story