Additional Sessions Judge Raj Kapoor sought reply from 22 respondents including the builder, its directors and Delhi Police on the plea and listed it for arguments on December 23, the next date of hearing.
"Issue notice to the respondents for the next date... Copy of the revision petition be also given to the prosecutor for the state," the court said.
The revision petition was filed by a woman challenging the order of a magisterial court, dismissing her plea for lodging of an FIR against the builder and its officials, claiming that the trial court had ignored the issue of alleged conspiracy to commit the offences of criminal breach of trust, cheating, embezzlement of funds, dishonest inducement and misappropriation with fraudulent intention under IPC.
The flat was booked in November 2011 by paying Rs five lakh as booking amount and till 2014, the woman had made a total of payment over Rs 1.8 crore to the builder, it said.
The project was scheduled to be completed within three years from the date of signing of agreement -- January 30, 2012, but neither the possession of the flat was handed over nor any information was given about its status, it said.
The petitioner has also approached the National Consumer Commission against the builder for deficiency in service and the matter is pending.
"Respondents have not only cheated the petitioner of her hard-earned money but many others who bought units/apartments etc in the project Enigma. It is apprehended that more than Rs 500 crore have been collected by respondents in connivance with each other and there is a possibility that they may run away to a foreign country in case immediate action is not taken," the petition said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
