Curious case of Sahara's $2-bn deal: BofA says not a banker

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 05 2015 | 5:00 PM IST
In a curious turn to crisis-ridden Sahara Group's efforts to raise funds to secure bail for its chief Subrata Roy, Bank of America has refuted claims of being a banker to the USD 2-billion funding offered by little known US-based entity Mirach Capital.
"We are in no way connected with this transaction," a spokesperson for Bank of America Merrill Lynch told PTI.
The bank's assertion follows a much-hyped deal proposed by the group last month with Mirach Capital, headed by Indian- origin Saransh Sharma, to raise funds for Roy's release from Tihar Jail where he has been lodged for almost a year now.
As per submissions made before the Supreme Court, Mirach was to conduct this transaction through funds deposited in an account with Bank of America, which was proposed to transfer funds to the accounts of two Sahara entities.
When contacted, Sharma refused any direct comment on Bank of America's denial of being the banker, but asserted that "the bank" for this transaction has been determined.
Sharma, CEO of Mirach Capital, also said he was committed to complete the transaction, even as he hinted at attempts by his rivals to sabotage the deal.
As per a Supreme Court order, dated January 9, Sahara lawyers placed before the bench "a communication dated January 5, 2015 addressed by Bank of America to Sahara India Pariwar, inter alia stating that under directions from Mirach Capital Group LLC, an amount of USD 1,050 million remains blocked and, earmarked till February 20, 2015 for the transactions being processed between Mirach and Sahara".
Queries sent to Saharas remained unanswered on this issue, but this entire funding arrangement has come under cloud with Bank of America denying any role in this deal.
Sources said that BofA came to know through media reports that its name was being mentioned in the court documents as a banker for the deal, following which it did the due diligence that indicated possible misuse of its name.
There were also speculations that some entities interested in full buyout of three iconic hotel properties owned by Saharas -- two in New York (The Plaza and Dream Downtown) and one in London (Grosvenor House) -- may be trying to scuttle the Mirach deal which mostly involves transfer of existing loans from Bank of China on these properties to a syndicate of investors.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 05 2015 | 5:00 PM IST

Next Story