DAE says its licence not required for mining titanium-bearing

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Oct 16 2017 | 11:42 PM IST
The Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) has informed the Madras High Court that it was no longer required to issue licence for mining of titanium-bearing minerals by beach sand mining (BSM) firms as the rare minerals had been delisted from the prescribed substances list in 2007.
This was stated in a counter-affidavit filed by DAE under-secretary T G Ravindran in response to a suo motu PIL taken up by the court relating to alleged illegal mining of BSM in some southern districts of Tamil Nadu.
The counter-affidavit refuted the allegations by Amicus Curie V Suresh that the Atomic Minerals Directorate (AMD) had failed to stop several players from carrying out the mining operations beyond the permitted quantities.
It said that in 2007, the DAE decided to delist titanium- bearing minerals and zircon from the prescribed substance list to encourage effective utilisation of these valuable minerals and their value addition.
As a consequence, these facilities no longer required licence from the DAE, the counter-affidavit submitted, indicating that it cannot be blamed for any illegal mining of BSM.
Referring to the allegation of non-applicability of relevant rules on firms involved in mining of atomic minerals, it said only a few facilities were producing minerals such as ilmenite, rutile, garnet, zircon and sillimanite.
These generate relatively less quantities of monazite enriched tailings and the monazite content was generally between 10 per cent and 25 per cent.
As per the Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules 2004, these facilities were required to keep the monazite- enriched tailings after removal of heavy minerals in trenches within their premises and to top them with silica-rich tailings so as to ensure that background radiation level did not increase.
The counter-affidavit submitted that it was not fair on the part of the amicus curie to accuse the AMD of failure to stop the mining operations of the firms which were carrying out the mining allegedly beyond permitted quantity.
Rejecting the charge that the DAE had issued handling licence to VV Minerals to mine ilmenite for which it did not have mining lease, it said the state government can issue permits for mining to them only after the grant of valid mining lease and ensuring that all statutory clearances were obtained by them.
The grant of handling licence itself cannot be cited for issuing permits on the basis of the handling licence, the counter said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 16 2017 | 11:42 PM IST

Next Story