DDCA case:Court to pronounce order on Kejriwal's plea on Jan18

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 20 2016 | 6:23 PM IST
A Delhi court will next month pronounce its order on whether Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders have right to be heard on point of framing of notice in a criminal defamation complaint filed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley against them.
The hearing before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Sumit Dass today saw Jaitley's counsel submitting that Kejriwal, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Raghav Chadha, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai "left no corner to defame" the union minister in Delhi District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.
"They (accused) tweeted, retweeted and spread defamatory material against my client. They left no corner to defame my client. The claim that they cannot be tried for section 34 (acts done by several persons in the furtherance of common intention) of IPC cannot be accepted," Jaitley's counsel, senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, told the court.
The court allowed the pleas of Kejriwal and Jaitley for exemption from personal appearance for today and fixed the matter for January 18 for order on whether the accused have a right to argue before a decision is taken on framing of notice.
The counsel was countering the arguments of noted jurist and Kejriwal's counsel Ram Jethmalani who said section 34 of IPC cannot be applied in the present case.
Jethmalani also said that there was no offence under 500 (defamation) of IPC made out against the Chief Minister.
While the defence counsel, including Jethmalani, argued that their clients have a right to be heard before the framing of notice, Luthra claimed that there is no provision in law which allows the accused to argue at this stage in such cases.
The accused had on October 24 moved the court seeking a chance to be heard before it decided on whether they would be put on trial in the present criminal defamation complaint.
Luthra had urged the court to frame the notice/charge against the accused persons.
Jaitley had filed the criminal defamation complaint alleging that the accused had allegedly defamed him in DDCA controversy.
A civil defamation suit has also been filed by Jaitley before Delhi High Court in relation to the matter seeking Rs 10 crore as damages.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 20 2016 | 6:23 PM IST

Next Story