Dec 16 gangrape case: Court to pronounce verdict on Sept 10

The court, which started hearing final arguments from August 22, reserved its order after the prosecution and the defence counsel concluded their submissions

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 03 2013 | 7:20 PM IST
A Delhi court will pronounce on September 10 its verdict in December 16 gangrape case of a 23-year-old girl in the moving bus with one of the accused admitting his presence in the vehicle but refuting the charge of raping the victim, who died in a Singapore hospital.

Accused Mukesh, who along with three other accused is facing murder charge, today told Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna during final arguments that he was only driving the bus and had not participated in any crime.

The trial, which concluded today after 130 hearings, saw Mukesh admitting his presence in the bus while other accused Vinay Sharma, Akshay Thakur and Pawan Gupta denied the charges levelled against them.

"My mere presence in the bus does not prove that I participated in the gangrape, loot and murder of the girl, who died in a Singapore hospital on December 29. I, on my own, have admitted that I was in the bus and was driving it and had never left my seat," V K Anand, counsel for Mukesh, said.

The court, which started hearing final arguments from August 22, reserved its order after the prosecution and the defence counsel concluded their submissions.

"The arguments have ended now. I will be giving the judgement on September 10," Judge Khanna said.

Anand, who concluded his final arguments in two hours, said there is nothing on record to prove my client had "hatched any conspiracy with other accused. There is no meeting of minds between the accused".

"Mukesh was at his home, his elder brother Ram Singh, the main accused (since deceased), had called him when the others had already planned a joyride on the night of the incident to pick up girls to have sex with them," Anand said, adding, since Mukesh was inebriated, he was not in his normal state of mind.

The counsel said that the prosecution has not brought any witness or evidence to show that Mukesh conspired with the other accused.

Claiming that Mukesh has "clean hands" and was not involved in the gruesome attack on the victim and her 28-year- old male friend, the counsel said he can only be held guilty for his presence in the bus and not for other offences.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 03 2013 | 7:15 PM IST

Next Story