In his written statement filed before Additional District Judge Rajrani, Mika said the suit was devoid of merits and it should be dismissed with exemplary cost as the intention was to extort money from the music composer and to pressurize him for achieving ulterior motives of the doctor.
The court asked doctor Srikanth's advocates Rajesh Kumar and Ahmad Shahrooz, to file rejoinder to Mika's statement and and for admission and denial of documents and put up the matter for August 8.
Mika, in his statement, said the contents of the suit are based on media reports and the media houses have filed their own version and their act cannot be attributed to him.
He denied that he deliberately levelled false allegations against the doctor. He also alleged that a case of sexual harassment and uttering words with an intent to outrage modesty of woman has been lodged against the doctor.
(Reopens LGD 13)
The singer said, "The suit in nature seems as malafide and is a sheer misuse of process of law and has been filed just to harass and humiliate the innocent defendant without any reasonable cause and excuse, but with intention to extort money and also to pressurise the defendant in order to achieve ulterior motives by the plaintiff."
In his suit, the doctor had said on April 11, 2015, he was dancing at the venue when Mika, without any reason, started pointing fingers at him from the stage and asked him to move aside allegedly in a rude manner using abusive language.
It further alleged that Mika slapped the doctor which led to bleeding in his eardrum.
"Shocked and surprised by the illegal and unlawful act of the defendant, the plaintiff felt very hurt, anguished, humiliated and embarrassed as the whole crowd gathered at the venue, most of them were his colleagues and friends...," the doctor said in his plea.
After the incident, Mika had alleged that the doctor was drunk and had misbehaved with women and kids, which was denied by the plaintiff.
Claiming that the video of the incident was uploaded on Internet and the news published in various newspapers, the doctor claimed that Mika had gone to the media with a "false and concocted version" of the incident.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
