"It is an anti-climax. All our efforts have come to naught. And to remove it at the last moment is an anomaly," says INTACH Delhi Convener A G K Menon who led a team in preparing a voluminous dossier for the nomination.
"We worked so hard on it since the conception of the idea. We conducted seminars, workshops, quizzes and tried to reach out to the young and the old of the city in our bid for the final goal. The government's decision is heart-breaking," he told PTI.
But, Menon said, "the area nominated is barely 1.5 per cent of the total Delhi area. It was the pride which we were aiming for through this recognition but only if decision-makers could understand the value of heritage preservation."
Menon claimed that "the government took this decision without consulting any of the other stakeholders concerned."
"We live in a democracy and it is a federal structure. At least we should have been consulted before finalising the decision."
Delhi's bid for the prestigious tag was being seen as a role-model for "other historic cities to follow suit".
"But, now this shocking news will set a very bad precedence," former Regional Director (North) of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), K K Muhammed told PTI.
"It has dashed the hopes of so many people, who have been working for preservation of heritage in the country. It was supposed to be a moral booster for them, but instead it is a sad commentary," he said.
Muhammed added that, "Delhi was seen as India's effort to get its first world heritage city. And, after Delhi, cities like Varanasi could have followed suit. But, it is so unfortunate that is out before the race has begun.
