Delhi Police seek framing of charges under TADA against Tunda

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 30 2014 | 6:22 PM IST
Delhi Police today pleaded in a local court that charges under stringent Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) be framed against Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) bomb expert Abdul Karim Tunda in a case relating to recovery of explosives here in 1996.
The Special Cell of Delhi Police said this in its written submission filed before Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Bharat Parashar on framing of charges against Tunda, one of the 20 terrorists India had asked Pakistan to hand over after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.
"Therefore, in the circumstances....This court may frame charges under sections 3 (3) and 5 of TADA along with section 5 of Explosive Substances Act read with 120-B (criminal conspiracy) IPC," the police said.
It also said a judgement passed by the designated trial court in November 1999, acquitting five arrested co-accused in the case on charges under the provisions of TADA, cannot be "held to be the exact interpretation of section 3 of TADA".
"It is submitted that in the light of the view expressed by the Supreme Court....The views expressed by designated court cannot be held to be the exact interpretation of section 3 of TADA. Hence, this court in the light of interpretation given by the Supreme Court may frame the charge under section 3 (3) of TADA Act against accused Abdul Karim Tunda," it said.
However, advocate M S Khan, who appeared for 72-year-old Tunda, countered the contentions saying the verdict of the designated court was not challenged by police before higher courts and thus it has attained finality.
"It is pertinent to mention herein that the said judgement of the designated court was not challenged and the same had attained the finality and the acquittal of the accused for the offences of conspiracy is in force and effect of the judgement is that prosecution could not establish criminal conspiracy and once the accused have been acquitted of the charges of criminal conspiracy, the accused Abdul Karim cannot be said to have conspired with them and as such no charges for the offences under section 3 (3) and 5 TADA are made out against the accused," Khan said in his written submission.
The court has fixed the matter for consideration on the charge on July 28.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 30 2014 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story