Democratic functioning stonewalled in Delhi assembly: BJP MLA

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 23 2016 | 6:42 PM IST
BJP MLA O P Sharma, who has been suspended from Delhi assembly for two sessions for allegedly making derogatory remarks against AAP legislator Alka Lamba, today claimed in Delhi High Court that democratic functioning had been "stonewalled" in the assembly.
Sharma's counsel told Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva that due to the majority enjoyed by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), there was "bias and illegality" in the way he was suspended from the assembly and prescribed procedures were not followed.
"The facts smack of clear malafide of the respondent (Legislative Assembly)," his counsel said, adding, "I am showing the manner in which democratic functioning has been stonewalled in the Assembly".
The counsel claimed that pertinent questions asked by the three BJP MLA's were "sidelined" in the assembly.
The court however asked the counsel, "First you have to show what is the extent of judicial intervention in the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly?"
The counsel, who read out part of proceedings of the assembly, said she would refer to the facts of the matter first and then address this issue.
When his lawyer said that all members of Ethics Committee which dealt with this matter were members of AAP, the court asked, "does the rules prescribe that Ethics Committee should have at least a member of the opposition party?"
Responding to the query, the counsel said "No. The rules does not prescribe so, but propriety demands this so that there are no allegations of bias."
Earlier, the lawyer representing Sharma, who was
suspended from the assembly on March 31 for two sessions, had said that the assembly cannot be represented by Delhi government. The government has in turn contended that assembly cannot be made a party.
The court is hearing his plea challenging his suspension.
The Delhi government had earlier alleged that the BJP MLA in the past too had engaged in "immoral, violent and appalling behaviour", while opposing the maintainability of Sharma's plea challenging his suspension.
Referring to a report of an Ethics Committee of the Delhi assembly, the government had said that Sharma was given chances to express regret on his remarks but had refused.
The Ethics Committee had earlier "unanimously" recommended stripping Sharma of his assembly membership for his remarks against Lamba and being "unrepentant" about it.
Sharma had earlier said "my intention was not to hurt Lamba as she is like my sister, but if she felt offended I express regret over it".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 23 2016 | 6:42 PM IST

Next Story