'Dental X-ray' by NGO to determine age of kids flayed

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Aug 26 2015 | 3:42 PM IST
Questions have been raised over the "dental X-ray" method used by a Hong Kong-based NGO for determination of the age of unregistered children here in collaboration with a local dental college.
The NGO, however, rejected the charge holding it had applied only a "tested and proven" method developed by clinicians in India and abroad.
Dubbing it as "unethical and illegal", former Secretary of Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), K S Parthasarathy, today claimed this method of imaging of bones or teeth can never indicate precisely the chronological age of an individual.
He was referring to media reports that the NGO, Date of Birth Foundation (DoBF), has issued age certificates to as many as 102 children including orphans after a dental college in Navi Mumbai carried out jaw line X-rays and calcium tests.
"On the basis of my own experience and different citations of journals and institutes, I roundly condemn that the children's age determination by using dental x-rays is unethical, imprecise and potentially illegal," Parthsarathy said in a statement.
Citing various medical reviews from British Medical Bulletin, Medical Research Council's Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCI Institute of Child Health-UK, Centre for Migration Policy Research, Department of General Paediatrics of Great Ormond Street Hospital London, he said imaging of bones or teeth can never indicate precisely the chronological age of the individual.
Countering the argument that age determination is an administrative requirement, he also said that use of X-rays for satisfying an administrative reason is not justified.
X-ray is a double-edged sword. Children are vulnerable and are many more times radiosensitive than adults, he said.
Dental x-rays expose radiosensitive tissues such as bone marrow, thyroid, brain and eye lens, and unnecessary application of x-rays which is a potential carcinogen and can in no way be justified unless the exposed subject has direct health benefit, Parthasarathy added.
The Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004 read with the mandatory Safety Code on Regulation of Nuclear and Radiation Facilities calls for strict adherence to AERB regulations with respect to radiation protection, he said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 26 2015 | 3:42 PM IST

Next Story