Direct Yamraj to send convicts to earth to serve prison terms, kin tell Calcutta HC

Image
Press Trust of India Kolkata
Last Updated : Oct 04 2019 | 9:00 PM IST

Relatives of two convicts, whose prison terms in a murder case were upheld by the Calcutta High Court years after their demise, have prayed that it direct God of Death, Yamraj, to send them back to earth to serve their sentences.

They also urged the court that contempt proceedings be drawn against Yamraj if he does not comply with the order.

The applicants prayed to Chief Justice T B N Radhakrishnan to recall a June 2016 order of the high court that had upheld a five-year prison sentence awarded to Samar and Pradip Chowdhury by Alipore sessions court in connection with the killing of a person in 1984.

While Pradip passed away in 1993, Samar died in 2010.

In case of dismissal of the application, the petitioners -- Samar's son, Ashok Chowdhury, and Pradip's widow, Renu -- urged the court to "communicate its order dated 16.6.2016" to Yamraj.

The court may direct Yamraj to immediately bring the convicts "back to earth so that they can surrender before the trial court forthwith, and serve the sentence imposed on them in accordance with law", the petition said.

The petitioners, who claimed to be daily wage labourers, also prayed for condonation of delay in informing the high court about the deaths of Samar and Pradip, claiming that they could not arrange for lawyers to represent the cases earlier.

The plea added that in the event of Yamraj failing to comply with the court order, the petitioners may be given leave to move an application for initiating civil contempt proceeding against the God of Death.

As per the fact sheet in the application, Samar and Pradip were involved in a clash near their residence in Garulia village under Nawpara police station in the then undivided 24 Parganas district in August 1984.

A person was killed in the clash.

The two were convicted by Alipore sessions court in February 1987 for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. They were sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and fined of Rs 1,000 each.

The sessions court order was challenged by the convicts before the high court.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 04 2019 | 9:00 PM IST

Next Story