Disclose action taken on complaint against ex-CJI: CIC to SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 03 2017 | 10:57 PM IST
The Central Information Commission today directed the Supreme Court and the Law Ministry to disclose action taken on a complaint against former Chief Justice of India Altmas Kabir in 2013.
The transparency panel also asked the Law Ministry to disclose what action has been taken in the matter related to alleged leak of a judgement which was posted on a private website before it was delivered by him.
Deciding the plea of RTI activist Subhash Agrawal, Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu also asked Central Public Information Officer of the Supreme Court to furnish details of the number of complaints rejected or accepted against the judges.
"The Commission directs the CPIO of Supreme Court to inform appellant, the action or follow up, on the representation dated May 6, 2013 of M Furquan regarding Justice Altamas Kabir, former CJI, which was forwarded to PPS of the CJI on March 27, 2013," Acharyulu said.
In his order, Acharyulu said there is no system for redressal of grievances in any court of India, and no mechanism to receive complaints against judiciary.
He said a comprehensive mechanism needs to be put in place to ensure both answerability and access to information about administration of justice without compromising the basic constitutional character of the independence of Judiciary.
"The Union Ministry of Law and Justice is expected to inform the appellant/citizen and the Commission, what is possible time required to introduce grievance-redressal system in the high courts and the Supreme Court," he said.
Agrawal had sought copies of complaints received at the Union Law Ministry against Kabir dated May 25, 2013 by former Justice V R Krishna Iyer, and complaint from M Furquan as forwarded from the President's Secretariat as referred in some news report.
He had also sought to know the action taken related to probe into leak of the Supreme Court verdict dated July 18, 2013 in the matter of "Christian Medical College, Vellore vs Union of India", on a private website several hours before its pronouncement in the court.
Agrawal had claimed that the matter was also brought before Chief Justice of India Justice P Sathasivam as per news report dated July 23, 2013.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 03 2017 | 10:57 PM IST

Next Story