Acting on a complaint of the victim's brother, NHRC said it had raised many questions about the "claimed genuineness" of the encounter on June 23, 2010 in which one Rajib Basumatary was killed in Tezpur's Doimoguri village.
Assam Police had maintained that Basumatary was an NDFB cadre and they opened fire at a militant group, in which the youth was also present, during a search operation. While two NDFB cadres succumbed to bullet injuries, others managed to escape.
"Rajib's elder brother had requested for Commission's intervention in the matter denying the police version that his brother was a cadre of NDFB or any terrorist outfit.
"He claimed that his brother was working in a private company and on June 22, 2010 had went to the village to look after his agricultural land when in the early morning this incident happened," the Commission said.
After considering various reports on record, NHRC raised many questions but Assam government, despite having been given sufficient time, did not respond to the queries, it said.
The Commission noted that it had received copies of the inquest, post postmortem and magisterial enquiry report.
It observed that the magisterial enquiry report "appeared to be perfunctory" as the police account about the genuineness of encounter was accepted.
However, the Commission said it found several points on which the clarifications were needed and asked Sonitpur SP to either clarify or confirm issues raised by it.
"According to the seizure list sent by the police, all items recovered from the dead bodies were found in 'a small house under the village of Doimoguri'. The firing, therefore, took place from within the house and, as per police, several men fired at them.
"If so, there would have been a large number of spent cartridges in that house. How would the police explain the recovery of only two spent cartridges?" NHRC pointed out.
It also noted that no report was sent to the Commission to confirm that either of the dead men had handled it.
"This could have been established only if their fingerprints were matched in a forensic laboratory with those on the pistol allegedly recovered from them. Was this standard forensic test done, and if so, what was the result?" the Commission had asked.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
