The court also expressed its displeasure over a magisterial court's refusal to order registration of FIR on her complaint.
"It is very unfortunate that a department (Delhi Police), which is responsible to investigate every crime in Delhi, is alleged to have shut its eyes from the crime having been committed upon their own employee i.I. Complainant and that allegedly by their officer i.E. SHO, who was duty bound to prevent crime in his area," Additional Sessions Judge Rajender Kumar Shastri said.
The sessions court, however, sets aside the magistrate's decision saying, "A prima facie case of cognizable offence was made out. In my opinion, it was contrary to law, not to direct the SHO to register FIR."
It also directed the complainant to appear before the trial court on August 12.
On making a complaint to her seniors, she was transferred to Sarita Vihar Police Station here.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
