Drug trials: Panel to look into practices of CDSCO

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 31 2013 | 11:35 PM IST
Almost a year after a parliamentary committee pointed out irregularities in grant of approvals to certain drugs without mandatory clinical trials on Indians, a fact-finding committee has been set up to review practices and procedures adopted by the drug controller and fix responsibilities.
The four-member expert committee headed by former Director of Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, T M Mahapatra will review the procedure and practices followed by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) for granting marketing approval and clinical trials on new drugs including fixed dose combinations.
The Committee will have former scientist Satyawan Singh of Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, former Kerala Drug Controller Venkat Krishnan and a representative of the Chief Vigilance Officer of Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare as its members.
The CDSCO had approved new drugs on scientific and statutory basis without Phase-III clinical trials on Indian population.
The panel will see that the scientific requirements and the regulatory compliance was adhered to by the CDSCO, as recommended by the Parliamentary Standing Committee.
The Parliamentary panel had pointed out that certain drugs were approved illegally by the drug controller in violation of Indian laws and in contravention of laid procedures.
It also recommended that the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) is expected to take action against those CDSCO functionaries who colluded with private interests and got the drugs approved in violation of laws.
The panel also wanted the DCGI to enquire into all such cases and fix responsibility and take appropriate action against the guilty involved.
It had pointed out that the CDSCO had gone out of the way to unlawfully and wrongly certify that some drugs were not new drugs, which helped the manufacturer to market the drug.
It also said that many experts gave letters of recommendation in identical language apparently drafted by the interested drug manufacturer before approving the drug.
The government had earlier set up a high-powered committee headed by Secretary Medical Research and Director of ICMR, V M Katoch, but it did not fix any responsibility and made general recommendations on the issue.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 31 2013 | 11:35 PM IST

Next Story