EC should allow matching results of at least 5 pc EVMs and paper trails: S Y Quraishi

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 14 2018 | 7:20 PM IST

The Election Commission should allow matching results of at least five per cent EVMs and paper trail slips to dispel doubts about the infallibility of voting machines, former chief election commissioner S Y Quraishi said today.

He also suggested that the winning and runner-up candidates should be given the chance to match results of any two electronic voting machines(EVMs) and their respective voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) machines.

"EVM is a very good thing. The dispute over it should end after the provision of VVPAT. I am, however, not happy with matching results of only one per cent EVMs and VVPATs in one polling station per constituency," he said at a debate on 'informed and ethical voting', held at Jamia Millia Islamia here.

VVPAT is a device which dispenses a slip with the symbol of the party for which a person has voted for. The slip appears on a small window for seven seconds and then drops in a box. But the voter cannot take it home.

There have been demands to increase the number of polling stations where EVM and VVPAT results are matched to allay concerns about voting machines being hacked to favour a particular political party.

Sharing his views on the proposed simultaneous elections to Lok Sabha and state assemblies, the former CEC opined that the "convenience" of Election Commission should not be a consideration for elections.

"'One nation, one election' has its pros and cons. However, this proposal has got diluted and the moral authority of the demand has ended," he said.

Further, he advocated a mix of first-past-the-post and proportional representation systems to avoid situations where political parties fail to get even a single seat despite having as high as 20 per cent vote share in an election.

"This happened with BSP in 2014 elections in Uttar Pradesh where it had third largest vote share (20 per cent) but zero seat. This is against the principles of participatory democracy," he added.

Professors Jagdeep Chhokar, Sanjay Kumar and Nuzhat Parveen Khan also participated in the debate.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 14 2018 | 7:20 PM IST

Next Story