Editors Guild seeks govt intervention for withdrawl of FIR

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 07 2018 | 8:50 PM IST
The Editors Guild of India today sought government intervention for the withdrawal of an FIR filed by the UIDAI over a newspaper report on the breach of details of more than one billion Aadhaar cards and called for an "impartial" investigation into the matter.
Criticising the lodging of the FIR, the Guild said it was "deeply concerned" over reports that Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) Deputy Director B M Patnaik had registered an FIR over The Tribune newspaper report in the Crime Branch of the Delhi Police.
The reporter of the Tribune newspaper has been booked under the Indian Penal Code sections 419 (punishment for cheating under impersonation), 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery), 471 (using a forged document) and also under sections of the Information Technology Act and the Aadhar Act, it added.
Patnaik has informed the police that an input was received from The Tribune newspaper that it purchased a service being offered by anonymous sellers over WhatsApp, that provided unrestricted access to details of any of the more than 1 billion Aadhaar numbers, according to the police.
The FIR mentions the names of the journalist and the people the reporter reached out to purchase the Aadhaar data, but they have not been shown as accused, the police said.
Instead of penalising the reporter, the Guild said the "UIDAI should have ordered a thorough internal investigation into the alleged breach and made its findings public".
"The Guild demands that the Union ministry concerned intervene and have the case over the newspaper report withdrawn apart from conducting an impartial investigation into the matter," it added.
"The Tribune report of January 3 by journalist had exposed how, for a small sum of money made to a payment bank, an agent of a private group would allegedly create a gateway to access details contained in an individual's Aadhaar card," the Guild said.
Using a false identity, the reporter had posed as an interested party and claimed in her report that the journalist had an easy access to details that individuals had listed in their Aadhaar cards, it added.
The UIDAI in a statement had subsequently denied that any data breach was possible, the Guild said.
"The Guild condemns the UIDAI's action to have the Tribune reporter booked by the police as it is clearly meant to browbeat a journalist whose investigation on the matter was of great public interest.
"It is unfair, unjustified and a direct attack on the freedom of the press," it said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 07 2018 | 8:50 PM IST

Next Story