Jamiat Ulama-E-Hind president Maulana Syed Arshad Madani alleged that efforts were being made to bar lakhs of women from enlisting their names in the National Register of Citizens (NRC), which is being updated in the northeastern state.
At a press briefing here today, Madani pegged the number of women likely to be affected in Assam at 48 lakhs.
The panchayat-issued certificate is a supporting document which indicates residential status of a married woman, who after marriage has left her parental place and is now living at the place of her husband, according to a statement issued by the Delhi Action Committee for Assam (DACA).
A delegation of intellectuals from Assam, accompanying Madani during the briefing, however, said the number of women to be affected is 27 lakhs.
The Gauhati High Court earlier this year ruled that the certificate issued by panchayat secretary had no statutory sanctity and could at best be a private document. The Jamiat and some other organisations have challenged the order in the Supreme Court.
Madani, however, stressed that the problem of certificate arose after the BJP-led governments came to power at the Centre and in the state.
"An effort is being made to prepare a ground to remove the women from the NRC. These are 48 lakh women...They will be deprived of their nationality," Madani said.
He was referring to the mass exodus of Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar to other countries including India.
"We want the world to know what is happening in Assam now," he said.
Madani also insisted that the state government strictly adheres to the Assam Accord, framed in 1985, while the issue of citizenship is being decided. As per the accord, anyone who entered Assam on or before March 24, 1971 is deemed as an Indian citizen.
"They say Hindu women, being Hindus, will be allowed to stay even if they come by 2014. But the Muslim women, whose families have been staying for 400 years, they won't be given rights," he further alleged, without naming anyone.
A political analyst from Assam, Hiren Gohain, differed with Madani on the number of women who will be affected in case the exclusion happens.
"We agree with Madaniji on what he said about the situation. But it is a question of 27 lakh, not 48 lakh women... Why allow 27 lakh people to go into a kind of limbo," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
