English merchant's travelogue refers to Ayodhya as Lord Ram's birthplace: 'Ram Lalla' to SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 14 2019 | 5:45 PM IST

English merchant William Finch, who visited India in 1608-1611, recorded in his travelogue that there was a fort in Ayodhya where Hindus believed Ram was born, the counsel for diety 'Ram Lalla' said in the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

'Ram Lalla', one of the three parties in the decades old Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute, has been granted one-third of the 2.77 acre land by the Allahabad High Court in 2010. Nirmohi Akhara and Sunni Waqf Board are the other parties.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi was informed by senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, appearing for 'Ram Lalla', that Finch visited India in early 17th century and recorded that there was a fort or castle in Ayodhya where Hindus believed Lord Ram was born.

Referring to the travelogue, published in the book 'Early Travels to India', he said the English trader has mentioned that Hindus believed Ayodhya was 'Janmasthan' (birthplace) of Lord Ram.

Vaidyanathan also referred to other travelogues, including those written by British surveyor Montgomery Martin and Jesuit missionary Joseph Tiefenthaler, to buttress his arguments about faith of people in the birthplace of Lord Ram.

It is the "belief and faith" of Hindus that Ayodhya is the birthplace of Lord Ram and he was born at the site of the disputed structure, Vaidyanathan further said addressing the bench, also comprising Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer.

The senior counsel also referred to the 'Puranas' (sacred mythological writings), believed to be written by sages, to support his arguments.

Advancing arguments on the sixth day of the hearing, he said the top court should not go beyond to see how rational this is. "It is the faith of people that it is the place where Lord Ram was born. It was always considered to be the birthplace of Lord Ram".

The bench asked Vaidyanathan about the structure. "When it was first called Babri Masjid?".

Responding to the query, the senior counsel said, "In the 19th century. There is no document available to show that earlier (prior to 19th century) it was known as Babri Masjid."
"It is clear that the structure (temple) was there," he told the bench, adding, "This (masjid) construction has come up at a place which is believed by the Hindus to be the 'Janmasthan'."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 14 2019 | 5:45 PM IST

Next Story