The resolution was submitted to a UN General Assembly committee despite a major diplomatic push by North Korea to have key provisions scrapped, including one urging the Security Council to refer Pyongyang to the International Criminal Court.
"We cannot ignore the suffering of the people in DPRK (North Korea)," Italian counselor Emilia Gatto told the committee as she presented the resolution on behalf of the European Union and Japan yesterday.
While North Korea has offered to cooperate with the European Union and the United Nations, the human rights situation in the country raises 'very serious concerns,' she said.
"These developments are clearly outweighed by the overall human rights situation," Gatto told the committee.
"We regret to note that there have not been any substantive improvements on the ground."
The resolution, which is co-sponsored by 48 countries, condemns human rights abuses in North Korea and calls for a criminal investigation based on the findings of a UN inquiry that laid bare the brutality of the Pyongyang regime.
The inquiry, released earlier this year, is based on testimony of North Korean exiles and details a vast network of prison camps and documented cases of torture, rape, murder and enslavement.
Speaking to the committee, North Korea accused the European Union and Japan of 'choosing the path of confrontation' and warned that any prospect for cooperation on human rights would be 'lost for good' if the resolution went forward.
"If the European Union and Japan enforce their attempt to adopt the resolution against DPRK by pushing the confrontation, it will only bring unpredictable results and the European Union and Japan will have to take full responsibility for all consequences to be incurred," warned North Korean counselor Kim Song.
A vote of the committee is expected later this month before the measure goes to the full Assembly in December.
Last month, UN special rapporteur for North Korea Marzuki Darusman held a first meeting with the North Korean delegation to the United Nations in New York to discuss a possible visit.
But the North Koreans suggested that the visit would only be possible if the resolution was amended.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
