Excess payment of salary, pension be compensated by officials responsible: HC

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Jun 27 2019 | 7:10 PM IST

The Madras High Court Thursday voiced concern over numerous complaints about excess payment of salary or pension to government employees in collusion with officials and ordered that the money be recovered from those responsible.

Justice S M Subramanian directed the state government to issue instructions to the authorities concerned to recover the financial losses incurred by the exchequer from officials responsible for excess payment of salary or pension.

Passing orders on a petition by 81-year-old retired government school headmaster Subburaj, the judge quashed the order of the Assistant Treasury Officer of Peraiyur seeking to recover "excess" payment, due to wrong fixation of pay, from the petitioner.

He said officials should conduct an enquiry into excess payments made to the petitioner and in the event of any error or negligence on the part of any official, suitable action should be initiated against them to compensate the loss to the exchequer by imposing recovery proportionately.

The judge impleaded the state Chief Secretary in the case for the limited purpose of issuing comprehensive instructions and circular to all officials that in case of any excess payment of salary, pension, arrears was noticed, the officials responsible for the same have to compensate.

In this regard, show-cause notice should be issued to all officials responsible for excess payment and on receipt of explanation received from them, suitable orders should be passed for imposing recovery.

The judge said there were a large number of complaints that excess claims were made with the collusion of officials.

Therefore, it was mandatory on the part of the government to recover all those excess payments made from the taxpayers' money and safeguard the interests of the state.

Excess payment made cannot be allowed to lapse as it would cause financial loss to the exchequer, he said, adding such a course was in violation of the Constitutional principles.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 27 2019 | 7:10 PM IST

Next Story