Former information commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu has written to the chief ministers of Odisha, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, seeking an explanation behind their support to the RTI amendment bill which "destroys the independence of information commissioners" and "encroaches upon the sovereign rights of states".
In an open letter, Acharyulu said all the three -- Naveen Patnaik, K Chandrashekar Rao and Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy --are eminent personalities who have sacrificed a lot in taking up people's issues, strived for the interests of their region, and also the rights and sovereign powers of the states under the Constitution.
"You have a duty to answer these questions, morally, legally (as Section 4(1)(c) of RTI Act mandates), constitutionally (federal principles) and politically (as you have proclaimed that you would form a front and fight for the rights of the states against centralisation of powers by the Union)," he said.
Listing out crucial questions on the implications of the amendment of the RTI Act, Acharyulu asked them to take legal assistance to find out their support to the bill which would kill their sovereign powers.
Acharyulu, a keen supporter of transparency, asked the three chief ministers if they know that the bill "kills the autonomy of state information commissions too".
"Do you know that this kind of the most unjustified and unconstitutional surrender of your sovereignty to powers of Delhi, with specific reference to your powers of appointing an information commissioner will disable you from determining the term and status of your own commissioners?" he said in the letter.
The former information commissioner also questioned the chief ministers on what have they achieved by supporting the "unconstitutional", "anti-democratic" and "anti-federal" bill.
The BJD-led by Naveen Patnaik, TRS-led by K Chandrashekar Rao and YSR-Congress led by Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy are said to have voted with the ruling NDA in the Rajya Sabha to support the amendment which takes away fixed tenure and parity of information commissioners with election commissioners.
"Is there any fear or apprehension you are suffering from? Among the three of you, only one has some charges against him pending, then why the other two were worried about the Centre?" Acharyulu said.
He urged the trio to release detailed statements on what compelled them to accept the "unconstitutional bill which destroys the independence of information commissioners and encroaches upon the sovereign rights of states".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
