The Food and Drug Administration said yesterday that it impounded orders of sodium thiopental, an anesthetic that has been used in past executions in combination with drugs that paralyse the muscles and stop the heart. It currently has no legal uses in the US.
"Courts have concluded that sodium thiopental for the injection in humans is an unapproved drug and may not be imported into the country," FDA spokesman Jeff Ventura said in a statement.
Texas and FDA authorities gave fewer details about the seizure there. Texas is the nation's busiest death penalty state, with about 250 death row inmates and 530 executions carried out over the past four decades. But it has not been using sodium thiopental in recent years.
The shortage of execution chemicals has become more acute over the past few years, ever since European companies started refusing to sell them to the US. Death penalty states have been scrambling to secure supplies, a search that in at least one case has taken them to India and a forlorn-looking business in a residential neighbourhood.
Tennessee brought back the electric chair as a backup method, and Utah did the same with the firing squad. Other states have also looked into buying drugs from international pharmacies.
Ohio, which has halted executions until at least 2017 because of a lack of drugs, sent a letter earlier this month to the FDA asserting that the state believes it can obtain a lethal-injection drug overseas without violating any laws.
Nebraska ran afoul of the FDA earlier this year when the agency said it could not legally import sodium thiopental and a second lethal-injection chemical it had bought for USD 54,400 from Harris Pharma, a distributor in India.
"Just wanted to let you know have a few states who have already ordered sodium thiopental. Would Nebraska be interested as I will have a few thousand vials extra," Chris Harris, CEO of Harris Pharma, wrote in April to Nebraska officials, who released the correspondence under a public records request.
Harris did not name those states, and no one answered the door at the residential address in Kolkata, India, that is listed as the firm's office.
Key details are blacked out of the Arizona documents, which were released as part of a lawsuit against the corrections department over transparency in executions, and it is not clear what country or company the state was doing business with.
A lawyer who has challenged Texas' death row practices questioned why any state would want to run the risk of a botched execution by buying drugs from an overseas supplier whose manufacturing standards are not well known.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
