FERA case: HC grants more time to Dhinakaran to cross-examine witness

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Aug 31 2017 | 6:32 PM IST
The Madras High Court today extended the time granted to sidelined AIADMK deputy chief TTV Dhinakaran to complete cross examination of a prosecution witness in a two-decade-old FERA case against him in the trial court here.
Passing orders on a miscellaneous petition by Dhinakaran, Justice M S Ramesh granted him time till September 11.
The court had earlier granted time till today for the cross-examination of the witness in the the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences) Court at Egmore, which had framed charges against Dhinakaran on August 1.
Stating that the prosecution had produced the witness only on August 28, Dhinakaran yesterday filed the petition in the high court seeking extension of the time limit.
When the matter came up for hearing, Dhinakaran's senior counsel B Kumar submitted that in view of voluminous documents and a number of witnesses in the case, it might not be possible to complete the cross examination within such a short period and hence sought more time.
Noting that prosecution had produced the witness only on August 28, the Judge in his order granted further time till September 11 to complete the cross examination.
He also directed the respondents (Enforcement Directorate) to ensure the appearance of the witness.
The ED has registered the case against Dhinakaran in 1996 charging him with acquiring 1.04 crore US dollars in foreign exchange without obtaining prior permission from the Reserve Bank of India in violation of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA).
According to the ED, he had allegedly deposited the amount in the current account of Dipper Investments Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, and having account with Barclays Bank, Sutton, UK.
Though registered in 1996, the ED could not proceed ahead with the case due to several rounds of litigation.
Dhinakaran was discharged from the case earlier by the lower court, but onFebruary 1this year, the high court had set it aside allowing a revision petition filed by the ED.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 31 2017 | 6:32 PM IST

Next Story