FIIs should go to courts against tax demand: Revenue Secy

Shaktikanta Das sticks to Rs 40,000 cr tax demand, says FIIs had lost appeal at AAR against 20% MAT on capital gains made by them

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 17 2015 | 1:06 PM IST
Refusing to relent on a Rs 40,000 crore tax demand on foreign portfolio investors, the government today said FIIs should look at courts to appeal against the tax rather than seek retrospective waiver.

Revenue Secretary Shaktikanta Das in an interview to PTI said FIIs had lost an appeal at the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) against levy of 20 per cent Minimum Alternate tax (MAT) on capital gains they made in years through March 31.

"If you are not satisfied with a particular judicial pronouncement, the answer is to go and appeal to a next higher judicial forum," he said.

Asked whether FIIs can be provided any relief after a ruling by AAR, Das said: "The answer is not in between rushing to the government and expecting the government to intervene through executive action or initiating a legislative measure to provide retrospective exemption".

Das, however, refused to comment on the total tax demand raised on FIIs or the number of foreign investors involved.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, who had previously stated that India was not a tax haven and legitimate dues from foreign investors will be pursued, had earlier this week said that "the amount involved is Rs 40,000 crore."

Yesterday in Washington, Jaitley said: "It may not be possible for any government after a court verdict, which is a transient court verdict, which is still subject to appeals, to intervene in those particular matters."

Das said the Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) had approached the government with certain problems before the Budget and hence they have been exempted from paying MAT on capital gains from the current fiscal, he said.

"The FIIs approached the government with certain difficulty in paying MAT. Considering that difficulty government provided the exemption. And naturally the exemption has to be given prospectively. And government has done it...

"So their future business is fully secured and is not affected by the issue of MAT," he said.

Stressing that the government would not bring in any retrospective changes to tax laws, Das said: "The government has time and again said that this government is not for retrospectivity in matters of taxation, it applies to new levies, it also applies to issues relating to exemptions.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 17 2015 | 12:42 PM IST

Next Story