FIRs will be registered for property defacement: Police to HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 02 2016 | 10:22 AM IST
Those who put up posters without permission can face prosecution for defacement of property as FIRs will now be lodged on complaints against such activities, Delhi Police here has told the Delhi High Court.
The submission was made before a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Ashutosh Kumar which is hearing a PIL by a retired army officer contending that advertisements, hoardings, banners, posters and billboards are being put up on residential buildings in violation of the policy and the law.
Delhi Police told the bench that its legal cell has issued a memo indicating that, FIRs will be registered under the Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act in case of defacement of property.
The response came after the municipal corporations, on an earlier date of hearing, had claimed that one of the "major hurdles" in removal of illegal hoardings in the city was their reappearance due to inaction by police.
The corporations had contended before the High Court that wherever immediate action was required, complaints were forwarded to Delhi Police, but "no action was forthcoming" from it.
Thereafter, the court sought police response on whether there had been any inaction on its part and, if yes, to take immediate steps to find a remedy.
In May last year, the court had ordered the corporations to remove all hoardings, billboards, unipoles and other forms of outdoor advertising which were in violation of the 2007 Outdoor Advertising Policy (OAP).
The court, had in September last year, directed the municipal corporations to remove all illegal hoardings at public and private advertisement sites in the national capital within eight weeks by uniformly applying the OAP and provide from time to time status reports of the progress made.
It also directed removal of superstructures which are left behind after the hoardings are taken off, saying they be either removed by the corporations or the occupant of the premises where they have been put up.
The court will hear the matter again on November 16.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 02 2016 | 10:22 AM IST

Next Story