The letter, which was written yesterday, is Banerjee's reply to Jaitley's acknowledgment of her first letter written in this connection in December.
"I am simply unable to accept the argument that the ostensible purpose of the (Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance) Bill is to protect the interest of the depositors. To the contrary, the bill is meant to do just the reverse.
"The bill proposes to introduce a draconian provision of bail in which has the potential of endangering the hard earned deposits of the public," Banerjee wrote, clearly stating her dissatisfaction with the reply of Minister of State for Finance Pon Radhakrishnan, written on behalf of Jaitley.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
