The Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe has to decide whether the scheme to buy sovereign bonds of debt-stricken nations from secondary markets, not been deployed yet but praised by many experts as a key factor for the current stability in the euro zone, violated the German constitution.
More than 35,000 petitioners, who include leading politicians, economists, lawyers and ordinary citizens, have argued that the ECB decision to buy sovereign bonds in "unlimited quantities, if necessary" is in effect a direct financing of governments, which is banned under the EU rules.
The petitioners also expressed concern that the scheme, known as Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), exposed taxpayers in Germany and other euro zone nations to "unforeseen risks" over which officials have no control and it violated the German parliament's sovereignty over the national budget enshrined in the constitution.
German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble, who represented the government at yesterday's hearing, defended the ECB's policies to shore up the cash-strapped nations and denied that the bond-buying programme violated its mandate.
ECB governing board member Joerg Asmussen, a former German finance ministry official, also denied that the central bank had violated its mandate.
"The ECB is fully aware of its mandate. The ECB cannot and will not substitute the actions of democratically legitimised government," he told the court.
Asmussen emphasised that the bond-buying programme significantly contributed to the stability in the euro area, by bringing down the borrowing costs of heavily indebted member-nations, especially in southern Europe and improved the availability of credits for businesses as it calmed down the financial markets.
German Bundesbank president Jens Weidmann, a staunch opponent of the ECB scheme, warned that the bond-buying programme will reduce the independence of the central bank and in future it will find it increasingly difficult to ensure price stability.
President of the Federal Constitutional Court Andreas Vosskuhle said in his opening statement that the court will examine whether Germany's constitution has been violated.
"It will not decide about the purpose and sense of the European bailout policies. That is the responsibility of the politics. The court also will not be influenced by how successful the ECP programme has been," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
