Govt draws the line, says no arbitration for tax issues

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 16 2015 | 7:42 PM IST
The government has set the record straight on tax disputes, maintaining they are not covered by the Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (BIPA) and need to be judicially and legally settled.
"...But again on the BIPA issue, let me mention, it has been our consistent view that that tax disputes can not be a matter of arbitration. They have to be judicially and legally settled," Revenue Secretary Shaktikanta Das told ET Now.
Das was replying to a query on a notice sent by Cairn Energy of the United Kingdom invoking the UK-India Investment Treaty against the tax demand raised by the Revenue Department on an internal business reorganisation seven years ago.
In the Notice of Dispute, Cairn has sought withdrawal of all notices, release of attached shares and payment of full compensation for any resulting damages sustained by it, including for the diminution in value of the attached shares.
The Income Tax Department last month had slapped a Rs 10,247 crore (USD 1.6 billion) tax demand on Cairn Energy Plc.
The tax demand relates to an alleged Rs 24,500 crore worth capital gains it made in 2006 while transferring all its India assets to a new company, Cairn India, and getting it listed on the stock exchanges.
On recent tax notices to foreign institutional investors (FIIs), which have kicked up a storm, Das said, "Now, if there is one judicial pronouncement, the answer is go to next higher judicial forum and not expect or not to rush to the government saying you amend the law retrospectively."
Noting that the issue of minimum alternate tax (MAT) on capital gains made by the foreign investors has been resolved prospectively, the Revenue Secretary said, "The past problem which is bound by judicial pronouncement has been completely isolated and it has to be dealt with in a proper legal manner."
Recently, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had also sought to defend the notices saying legitimate tax demand cannot be considered "tax terrorism" because India is not a tax haven.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 16 2015 | 7:42 PM IST

Next Story