The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Monday sought a response from the state government by January 17 on petitions by farmers and women of 29 villages in Amaravati region, alleging that police were acting against norms and suppressing peaceful protests against the proposed move to shift the capital from here.
When the petitions came up before a vacation bench,headed by Chief Justice J K Maheswari, it directed the state government to file an affidavit with full details by Friday.
State Advocate General S Sriram wanted the case put off till next Monday, but the Bench disallowed his plea and directed that an affidavit be filed by Friday.
The court gave the direction on a batch of petitions filed by the women and the farmers against alleged police 'high handedness'.
They also presented to the court what they claimed was photographic evidence of the police action.
The petitioners contended that police were acting against norms and suppressing peaceful protests.
Farmers and women in the 29 villages in Amaravati region have been on an agitation path since December 18, demanding that the Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy government drop its plan to shift the state capital to Visakhapatnam.
While the agitation continued without any incident in the first week, police subsequently started using force to quell the protestors in different villages, they submitted.
Police also claimed that they violated prohibitory orders under Section 144 of Cr PC and Section 30 of the Indian Police Act and slapped cases against them, the petitioners submitted.
In the last one week, police launched a massive crackdown on the protests and made a lathi charge as women tried to take out a paadayatra (foot march) from the region to Kanaka Durga temple in nearby Vijayawada city, the petitioners alleged.
Male constables allegedly manhandled women protestors, besides abusing them.
The women also alleged that they were being kept under house arrest and not allowed to venture out.
Guntur Rural Superintendent of Police C Vijaya Rao, however, denied all the allegations and said they had only tried to enforce the prohibitory orders.
The National Commission for Women also conducted an inquiry into the police excesses.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
