Govt returns collegium proposal on Justice Joseph, says his elevation to SC not "appropriate"

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 26 2018 | 8:45 PM IST

The government today turned down a Supreme Court collegium proposal to elevate Justice K M Joseph to the top court, saying his promotion may not be "appropriate" and needs to be reconsidered, a decision that evoked sharp reactions from legal fraternity and opposition parties.

The government's stand on 59-year-old Joseph, Uttrakhand High Court Chief Justice who has over two years of service left, is being seen as widening of the rift between the executive and the judiciary, which have been at loggerheads over issues like appointment and transfer of judges.

However, the government received immediate support from the collegium head, Chief Justice Dipak Misra, who said the executive was well within its rights to reject Justice Joseph's name while accepting the second name even though both were recommended for elevation together by the collegium. The names of Malhotra and Justice Joseph were recommended by the collegium in January.

In a letter to Justice Misra, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said the government's decision that the collegium should reconsider its proposal for Justice Joseph's elevation has approval of the President and the Prime Minister. Making its case, Prasad also flagged that the SCs/STs have no representation in the apex court since long while Kerala High Court, Joseph's parent court, is sufficiently represented in the top judiciary.

The last Dalit judge in the Supreme Court was K G Balakrishnan, who retired as Chief Justice of India in May 2010.

Prasad said the proposed appointment of Joseph "at this stage does not appear to be appropriate" and it would also not be "fair and justified to other more senior, suitable and deserving Chief Justices" and senior judges of various High Courts.

The government's decision evoked sharp reactions with the SC Bar Association President Vikas Singh terming it as "disturbing" and the main opposition party, Congress, asserting that the independence of the judiciary "is in danger" and asking if it would now speak in one voice that "enough is enough".

Congress leader P Chidambaram said, "What is holding up Justice K M Joseph's appointment? His State or his religion or his judgement in the Uttarakhand case? As the law stands now, the recommendation of the SC collegium is final and binding in the appointment of judges. Is the Modi government above the law?"

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 26 2018 | 8:45 PM IST

Next Story