The regulatory body's response came on a batch of pleas challenging the Gurdwara election results on the ground that the reserved symbols could be alloted only to religious parties
which are registered under the Societies Registration Act.
Besides the DGE, the two outfits--SAD and SAD (Delhi)-- also conceded before Additional District Judge Kamini Lau that they are religious parties not registered under the Societies Registration Act.
The court was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the symbols alloted to these parties, alleging that as per the 2010 amended Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (Election of Members), Rules, religious parties are required to be registered under the Societies Registration Act and only registered parties are entitled to get reserved symbols.
A total of 36 similar petitions have been filed in the court which today conducted the hearing in 23 such matters.
It listed the matter for April 1 for filing of replies by the candidates of the two parties, DGE and returning officers.
Advocate Inder Chand, appearing for the plaintiffs who are members of Panthak Sewa Dal and lost the election, said that after the 2010 amendment in the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (Election of Members), Rules, religious parties are required to be registered and there is separate provision for the new parties.
The plaintiffs had contended that the DGE improperly
allocated the reserved symbols to the candidates sponsored by the parties not registered under the Society Registration Act.
SAD and SAD (Delhi) had been allotted reserved symbols of 'bucket' and 'car' respectively.
The plaintiffs have said they had contested the elections as candidates of the Panthak Seva Dal, claiming it was a registered religious party with the DGE and was alloted reserved symbol of 'kisan driving tractor'.
These have alleged the DGE and the returning officers of the wards had "acted illegally, arbitrarily and contrary to the mandate of law while allotting reserved symbols" to the candidates of the two parties .
"There is a grave threat that the records of the elections held on February 26, 2017 may be tempered, manipulated and fabricated. For the fair play and justice, it is desirable that these be preserved and the entire records in question be seized," the suits have said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
