A division bench of Justices A S Oka and A A Sayed was hearing a public interest litigation by activist Pravin Wategaonkar alleging that senior bureaucrats and politicians held 'benami' (proxy) flats in the Adarsh residential building, which was a quid-pro-quo for clearing files related to the society in violation of several norms.
The high court had earlier refused to accept two reports submitted by the CBI giving out details on what their probe has revealed.
The bench directed the CBI to submit a fresh probe report on December 16.
As per HC's earlier direction, Joint Director CBI (Western Region) Amrit Prasad was present in the court today.
Prasad, however, said if the high court feels further probe is required, the agency can be directed to do so.
The court today further observed that another bench of the high court had in April this year, while directing demolition of the 31-storey Adarsh building in south Mumbai, said that the Union and state government shall consider initiating criminal or civil proceedings against ministers, bureaucrats and politicians for misuse of official positions.
officers of the then Maharashtra government who had dealt with Adarsh files and allegedly obtained benami flats.
He claimed that when CBI arrested one of the promoters of Adarsh society, Kanhaiyalal Gidwani in 2011, it "claimed in the remand papers that they needed Gidwani's custody because he held benami flats for political leaders".
Gidwani, a Congress leader, and his family members owned a total of 10 flats in Adarsh. His sons owned three flats while in respect of other flats, the source of money and real ownership was not clear, the PIL has said.
Gidwani passed away in 2012.
