HC asks DMK to substantiate claim on trust vote

The Madras High Court today directed the DMK to produce video clippings or any other recordings to substantiate its claim that the trust vote on February 18 was in contravention of the Assembly rules.
On February 20, the DMK had moved the high court seeking declaration of the confidence vote null and void as it was conducted in "contravention" of the Assembly rules.
The First Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Huluvadi G Ramesh and Justice R Mahadevan also asked the DMK's counsel, R Shanmugasundaram, in what way the party was aggrieved in the matter.
On being asked what made the DMK to move such a plea when the issue was only between former chief minister O Panneerselvam and the incumbent Edappadi K Palaniswami, the counsel said the DMK is the main opposition in the Assembly.

M K Stalin, the Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly, was "stopped" near the War Memorial, a few metres away from the Assembly complex, and was "made to walk" to the House.
Also all the DMK legislators were "illegally evicted from the House when they sought for a secret ballot", the counsel submitted.

N L Rajah, appearing on behalf of the Advocates Forum For Social Justice, which also wanted the trust vote to be declared null and void, contended that all the MLAs of AIADMK, who were kept in a resort before the trust vote, were escorted to the Assembly in buses "which clearly showed that they were kept in illegal detention".

He said that an FIR was pending against Palaniswami in connection with the detention of the MLAs.
The bench adjourned the case till February 27 for further hearing after the arguments.
Palaniswami had won the trust vote 122-11 in the 234-member Assembly aided by the eviction of MLAs of the DMK and a walkout by its allies, amid stormy scenes during which mikes were uprooted, chairs toppled and sheets of papers torn.
(REOPENS LGM 1)
Meanwhile, a PIL filed in the Madras High Court bench in Madurai seeking a fresh floor test by the Palaniswami government through 'secret' voting was today transferred to the court's principal seat.

The bench comprising justices A Selvam and P Kalaiyarasan transferred the PIL filed by T Anazhagan, son of late AIADMK MLA Tamaraikani, in view of similar plea by the DMK being heard by the principal seat here.
The petitioner alleged that on February 18 Speaker Dhanapal had supported the chief minister, rejected a plea for secret voting and ordered eviction of all DMK MLAs.
He sought a direction from the court to set aside the declaration the voting result as illegal and order a fresh vote with secret ballot.
The petitioner claimed that most of the AIADMK MLAs would have supported Panneerselvam had the secret ballot system been adopted. The MLAs would have voted without fear of any threat.

He charged the Speaker with "using force to detain" the AIADMK MLAs (in the assembly) and conducting the trust vote.
The MLAs were treated like cattle, and one MLA was not even allowed to participate in the funeral of his mother, he claimed.