When the petition came up for hearing, a Division bench comprising Justice A Selvam and Justice V S Ravi ordered notice to the Principal Home Secretary returnable by December 4.
Petitioner A Sadayandi, a PIL litigant, submitted that 19 innocent persons were murdered by hirelings in various districts, including Madurai and Virudhunagar, in the three years ending December 2013. But their families have not been compensated although it was the duty of the police to protect people.
This was a violation of Police Standing Order which said both parties should not be charged. The cases against the victims of aggressors should be quashed and there should be periodical inspection about this factor.
Another charge levelled against the police, according to the petitioner, was that they made compromise in cases where the complainant had made out a cognizable offence.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
