The constituency fell vacant after the death of sitting member and then Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa on December 5 last. An earlier notification for holding the bypoll on April 12 was rescinded over alleged electoral malpractices.
First bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar gave the direction to the EC while closing the DMK's petition seeking verification of the electoral roll to weed out bogus voters in the constituency.
The bench closed the petition by DMK secretary R S Bharathi after recording the submission by EC counsel Niranjan Rajagopal that 100 per cent verification of the electoral rolls had been done during which names of 45,819 voters had been deleted.
It asked the EC to publish the information about the deletion on its website by tomorrow.
The court said it was expected that the EC will announce the election date for the constituency at the earliest and conduct the exercise by December 31, as directed in its September 18 order, on a public interest litigation petition.
It recorded the submission of senior counsel P Wilson for the petitioner that his client was not pressing his prayer for forbearing the EC from notifying the bypoll without taking penal action against those involved in electoral malpractices, which led to the cancellation of the voting earlier.
The counsel for the EC yesterday mentioned the matter before the bench and said the commission was not in a position to declare the schedule for the by-election in view of the pendency of the two petitions.
Submitting that the EC cancelled the byelection based on a letter by the Income Tax department, naming some persons who indulged in "bribing" the voters, the petitioner sought to know why no action was taken against them.
A police complaint lodged by then Returning Officers did not name the offenders though the I-T had mentioned them, counsel for the petitioner said alleging collusion between the officers and the offenders.
Regarding the investigation into electoral malpractices, he said a petition relating to it was pending in court.
On the charges against the returning officers, the counsel contended that the petitioners had not made any representation to the EC before making the "personal allegations" in the petition.
The petitioner has also sought a compensation of Rs five lakh from the EC towards his campaign expenditure for the cancelled byelection, and urged for recovering it from persons who indulged in the malpractices.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
