Justice B Rajendran was passing orders on a petition filed by the actress seeking quashing of the passport officer's December 28 order by which her application for re-issue of passport was returned.
"This court is of the view that the order of return passed by the respondent, refusing to re-issue the passport to the petitioner on the ground that criminal cases are pending against her, cannot be legally sustained. The respondent is therefore directed to process the application of the petitioner and to re-issue or renew the passport in her favour, if it is otherwise in order."
The judge said it is well settled that pendency of criminal cases is not a bar or embargo for the respondent to re-issue the passport to the petitioner with fresh pages in her passport.
"This is more so that there are three cases, according to the petitioner herself, registered against her and they are in various stages. Therefore, till the conclusion of the criminal proceedings, the petitioner cannot be denied the benefit of the passport which has validity till 08.03.2022."
"Thus, it could be evident that there is no specific objection raised by the respondent for re-issuing the passport to the petitioner."
The application was returned only by citing the pendency of the criminal cases against her, "which cannot be said to be a bar or embargo for her to get the passport re-issued in her favour," the judge said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
