HC directs TN Bar Council to take action against two advocates

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Aug 01 2015 | 12:42 AM IST
The Madras High Court today directed the Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, to take disciplinary action against two lawyers for violation of 49[1][c] of Advocates Act and Rule of Bar Council for making allegations against Public Prosecutor S Shanmuga Velayutham.
The advocates Manikandan Vathan Chettiar and Mathan Kumar made some allegations against Velayutham while appearing for one Nachimuthu in a criminal case filed against him.
Justice P N Prakash, apart from directing the Bar Council to take action against the advocates, also directed Nachimuthu, who made complaints against Velayutham in connection with the case, to pay Rs 10,000 to Tamil Nadu Legal Services Authority.
The case relates to a criminal investigation by police at Tiruppur where Nachimuthu made allegations against Velayutham stating he was preventing production of case diary before the Court.
Justice Prakash, who took a serious view of the allegations made against the Public Prosecutor, in his order said "the Bar Council of India has framed rules setting the standard of professional conduct and etiquette to be observed by the advocates."
"Bar Council Rule No.4 states that an advocate shall use his best efforts to restrain and prevent his client from resorting to sharp or unfair practises of doing anything in relation to the court, opposing counsel or parties which the advocate himself ought not to do", the judge said.
"An advocate shall refuse to represent the client who persists in such improper conduct. He shall not consider himself a mere mouth-piece of the client and shall exercise his own judgement in the use of restrained language in correspondence, avoiding scurrilous attacks in pleadings and using intemperate language during arguments in court", the judge said.
"This is not merely an isolated incident of such uncharitable allegations being made against S Shanmuga Velayutham. Manikandan Vathan Chettiar's office has been consistently making such allegations."
"Shanmuga Velayutham is the Public Prosecutor appointed by the state government for this High Court. Therefore, he holds a very responsible position in the state apparatus. This Court cannot be a silent spectator to such insinuations", the judge said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 01 2015 | 12:42 AM IST

Next Story