Justice S Nagamuthu, who passed the order on a petition by a candidate whose plea for letting him know the marks obtained by him had been rejected by TNPSC, did not agree with the contention of the commission that in view of confidentiality, the marks could be published only after final selection was made.
Referring to a stand of TNPSC that the marks can be disclosed for any individual on their application under the Right to Information Act, the Judge said, "I do not find any reason to why such information should be withheld without making it public thereby driving thousands of candidates to approach the TNPSC under the RTI Act."
Petitioner A Gopikrishnan, a Scheduled Caste candidate, had sought to know the exact marks secured by him.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
