A bench comprising justices Huluvadi G Ramesh and K Ravichandra Baabu gave the direction while disposing of a batch of petitions related to the civic elections.
It rejected the contention of the SEC that though provision had been made for using EVMs in the urban local bodies election under the District Municipalities Act, no equivalent provision had been made under the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act.
That being the case, the central act would prevail over any state Act not in conformity with the central legislation. Therefore there would be no embargo on the SEC to use EVMs in the rural local body elections, it said.
The bench had earlier reserved orders on the petitions by DMK, PMK and others seeking various directions, including using EVMs and deploying central government officials, to conduct the Urban and Rural Local Bodies Election, 2016.
On the prayer for usage of EVMs, the bench said "...This court directs that the State Election Commission may, as suggested by it on an experimental basis wherever it is possible start using EVMs in the urban local bodies election for the present election."
It also said the SEC may also try using "Multi Point Single Choice Electronic Voting Machines" in the panchayat elections so that its feasibility and viability can be assessed and based on the outcome, the system can be implemented in phases over the period of next five years so as to enable usage of the EVM's in its entirety from the next elections.
"Mere apprehension could not take the place of actual proof. There is nothing on record to suggest that the state government employees would sideline with the ruling party in the ensuing elections to the detriment of the citizens," the court said.
However, it said the apprehension of the petitioners also could not be brushed aside as such. For the free and fair conduct of poll, "this court feels that the SEC may try and identity vulnerable polling booths throughout the state and try to induct central government employees as polling officers and observers so that the sanctity of the election was not questioned."
It directed the state government to take earnest efforts to have the work of delimitation of the wards carried out so as to fulfill the obligations cast on the state immediately on the completion of the local bodies elections.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
