HC dismisses petition seeking quashing of NoC issued to ship

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Oct 10 2017 | 9:22 PM IST
The Madras High Court today dismissed a petition that sought a direction to quash the no- objection certificate issued by the director general of shipping for sailing of the 'MT BW Maple', one of the two ships which collided off the Ennore coast in January.
The First Bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar said, "We do not want to interfere in the no-objection certificate issued by the Director General of Shipping (DGS) for sailing of the vessel," disposing of a writ plea filed by Raja, President, National Union of Fishermen.
Raja sought a direction to quash the no-objection certificate issued by the DGS, Mumbai, on September 14.
He submitted that when cases were pending against the vessel in the southern bench of the National Green Tribunal for compensation for the environmental pollution created by the accident and criminal investigation was going on, the DGS has granted no-objection certificate for departure of the ship from Ennore port.
However, the judges said, "There is not even a whisper in the petition how the further detention of the vessel would be of any use."
The accident occurred on January 28 when M T BW Maple with a flag of Isle of Man was leaving the port after emptying Liquefied Petroleum Gas and M T Dawn loaded with petroleum oil lubricant was on its way to the berth at the Ennore port.
There was no casualty or injury to anyone in the incident.
Terming DGS's no objection certificate issued to the ship for leaving the port as "whimsical", the fishermen union moved the court to impound the vessel in Ennore port till all the claims and compensation of fishermen were settled.
Denying it the counsel for the shipping company contended that the owners of the vessel through their insurers had already arranged for executing a bank guarantee for Rs 203 crores in favour of DGS, based on which the department has come to the conclusion that the continued detention of the vessel was not necessary.
"The bank guarantee furnished by the owners of ship for Rs 203 crore covers the claims of the petitioner. The owners of the other ship have also furnished bank guarantee of equal amount. Both the vessels are covered by insurance," the bench said.
"We do not want to interfere with the question of compensation as the matter is already seized by the National Green Tribunal. We are not inclined to give any direction with regard to releasing of the ship in the present petition," the bench said disposing of the petition.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 10 2017 | 9:22 PM IST

Next Story