HC expresses "shock" over non-appearance of accused in lower

Image
Press Trust of India Allahabad
Last Updated : May 30 2013 | 10:07 PM IST
Allahabad High Court has expressed "shock" over the fact that accused in more than six lakh criminal cases across Uttar Pradesh have not been produced before the concerned trial courts even after filing of charge-sheets and directed the police to "ensure" their appearance.
A Division Bench comprising justices Amar Saran and Dinesh Gupta also asked the lower courts not to accept charge sheets "unless accused are produced".
The court directed UP's Director General of Police and Principal Secretary (Home) to ensure the presence of the accused in respective trial courts within three months.
The Bench noted with dismay in an order dated May 24, "in as many as 6,20,104 (six lakh, twenty thousand, one hundred and four) cases, the accused have not been arrested after submission of reports under section 173(2) CrPC".
Perusing a tabular chart prepared by the High Court registry "on the basis of information furnished by District Judges from 71 districts", which showed that in many cases accused had not appeared before trial courts for periods as long as "more than two years", the Bench remarked "these figures shock the conscience of the court".
Directing the Principal Secretary (Home) and the DGP to ensure that accused in all the aforementioned cases were produced before the respective trial courts within three months, the court made it clear "they will not be required to first obtain warrants/summons from the courts concerned in each case".
The court also asked the Home Secretary of the state to ensure availability of adequate infrastructure so that photocopies of papers, under Section 207 CrPC, could be handed over "free of cost" by the Investigating Officer to the accused "at the time of initial appearance".
The court also directed the Principal Secretary (Finance) and the Principal Secretary (Law) "to render all assistance to the Home Secretary for complying with these directions".
The court also directed the trial courts "not to accept reports under section 173(2) CrPC unless the accused are produced in custody or appear before the court at the time of submission of the report" except when the same was not possible "due to illness or other genuine reason".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 30 2013 | 10:07 PM IST

Next Story