A bench comprising justices N. Kirubakaran and R. Tharani directed the government to state how many employees had used the G.O. No.196 of May 20, 1991 to go abroad and how many had rejoined after returning.
The court was hearing an appeal by the government against the order of a single judge directing it to consider the representation of a deputy tahsildar for a notional promotion as deputy collector after working abroad for three years.
"When there was unemployment problem in this country, how can the government allow an employee to leave the country for three years. When an employee is abroad, would it not affect the local administrative job.
"The post will remain vacant for so many years and it could not be filled till he returned and rejoined. All this was against public interest," the judges said.
They also impleaded the state secretary (personnel and administrative reforms) and the labour secretary suo motu and asked them to reply.
They posted the matter for hearing on February 15.
"Does that not mean he is having a job here and work in a foreign private firm also," the bench asked.
The judges asked how many people were granted permission to work in foreign private firms and how long an employee was permitted to work.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
