HC holds mining orders illegal in respect of two firms

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 30 2015 | 1:02 AM IST
Madras High Court today held that the stoppage of mining orders issued by the state government in August-September 2013 was illegal in respect of two companies, including one owned by trade baron Vaikundarajan.
Justice T Raja, before whom the petitions filed by Transworld Garnet India Private Limited and V V Minerals, a firm represented by its Managing Partner S Vaikundarajan came up, appointed a new inquiry committee headed by retired High Court Judge, Justice Vinod Kumar Sharma, to probe the petitioners' mining activities in a "fair manner."
The judge held that the orders of the government in August-September 2013 could be held valid only in respect of other companies, but not to the petitioner-units.
Regarding the inspection conducted and reports submitted by the earlier committee headed by IAS officer Gagandeep Singh Bedi with regard to other quarries, the judge said:"they are legally valid and as such the same cannot be disturbed."
Only in regard to the petitioner quarries, since the chairman of the committee (Gagandeep Singh) "is biased, the government orders are set aside" and a former judge of the high court appointed to undertake the task and submit the report to the government within three months which will consider it within three months thereafter, the judge said.
Mining of beach sand came to a halt in the southern districts after the orders were issued.
Concurring with submissions of senior counsel for the two companies, Gopal Subramanian, the court said "the petitioners have rightly invoked the rule of 'bias' on the ground that Bedi is biased and prejudiced against them and as such, he could not have been chairperson of the special committee."
Justice Raja came to the conclusion that Gagandeep Singh Bedi, chairperson of the inquiry committee, was likely to be biased against the companies because he heard their business rivals such as Dhayadevadas, but 'arbitrarily refused' to extend the same benefit of personal hearing to companies.
Referring to V V Mineral's complaint to the National Human Rights Commission levelling harassment allegations against Bedi in 1997-98, the judge said,"there is every possibility for the officer to get motivated against the companies."
The matter relates to two writ petitions filed by the two firms to quash the industries department orders asking the companies to stop mining with immediate effect.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 30 2015 | 1:02 AM IST

Next Story